ATI FireMV 2200 PCI vs Radeon HD 8400E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1234not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameKalindiRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8000.96
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8400E has a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400E and FireMV 2200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8400E is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2200 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Radeon HD 8400E
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
FireMV 2200 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400E or FireMV 2200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.