AMD Radeon HD 8400 vs Topaz

AMD Radeon HD 8400
AMD Topaz

General info

Comparison of Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN
 
GCN 3.0
Code name
Kabini
 
Topaz
Type
Laptop
 
Desktop
Release date
23 May 2013
 
n/d

Technical specs

Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
128
 
384
Core clock speed
600 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
n/d
 
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Shared memory
+
 
n/d

API support

APIs supported by Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
 
12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL
n/d
 
4.6

Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8400

We are unaware of any advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8400 over AMD Topaz.

Advantages of AMD Topaz

More pipelines (384 vs 128)

So, HD 8400 or Topaz?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon HD 8400 and AMD Topaz. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8400 is a notebook card while Topaz is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon HD 8400 and Topaz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
AMD Radeon HD 8400
AMD Topaz
Like
Like

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD 8400 or Topaz, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.