ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 vs HD 8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1247not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameKalindiM12
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 November 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1286
Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speedno data210 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million76 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2001.000
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared243 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.888 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2013 1 June 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

HD 8400 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400 and Mobility Radeon 9550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8400 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon 9550 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 156 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400 or Mobility Radeon 9550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.