ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs Radeon HD 8400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1247not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)no data
GPU code nameKalindiRage Pro Turbo
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 November 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 1997 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed400 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2000.08
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)6.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2013 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

HD 8400 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8400 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 156 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8400 or 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.