Radeon RX 550X 640SP vs HD 8330

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1242not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameKalindiBaffin
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 August 2013 (12 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128640
Core clock speed497 MHz1019 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1071 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97642.84
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS1.371 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

HD 8330 has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 550X 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and Radeon RX 550X 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 216 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 550X 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or Radeon RX 550X 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.