Quadro Plex 7000 vs Radeon HD 8330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.34no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKalindiGF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 August 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128512 ×2
Core clock speed497 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97636.74 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS1.176 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs448 ×2
TMUs864 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

HD 8330 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and Quadro Plex 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro Plex 7000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
Quadro Plex 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 215 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or Quadro Plex 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.