ATI FirePro V3800 vs Radeon HD 8330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1242not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameKalindiRedwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 August 2013 (12 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128400
Core clock speed497 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97613.00
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs820
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 43 Watt

HD 8330 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 187% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 217 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 53 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.