HD Graphics vs Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1200
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
Power efficiencyno data1.57
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameKalindiIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 August 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12848
Core clock speed497 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.9766.300
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs86

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8330 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP and HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 2730 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP or HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.