ATI Video Xpression vs Radeon HD 8310G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameTrinityMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)23 October 1995 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$239

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed424 MHz62 MHz
Boost clock speed554 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.760no data
Floating-point processing power0.1843 gflopsno data
ROPs41
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataEDO
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data62 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data496.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 23 October 1995
Chip lithography 32 nm 600 nm

HD 8310G has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8310G and Video Xpression. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8310G is a notebook card while Video Xpression is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8310G
Radeon HD 8310G
ATI Video Xpression
Video Xpression

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.