GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 8310G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Power efficiencyno data1.03
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateJuly 2013 (12 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed554 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76013.60
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 130 Watt

HD 8310G has 550% lower power consumption.

GRID K140Q, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8310G and GRID K140Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8310G is a notebook graphics card while GRID K140Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8310G
Radeon HD 8310G
NVIDIA GRID K140Q
GRID K140Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K140Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8310G or GRID K140Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.