GeForce GT 720 OEM vs Radeon HD 8280E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1234not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.09no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameKalindiGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)29 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed450 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60015.89
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS0.3813 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 29 October 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8280E has 233.3% lower power consumption.

GT 720 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8280E and GeForce GT 720 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8280E is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 720 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8280E
Radeon HD 8280E
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM
GeForce GT 720 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8280E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8280E or GeForce GT 720 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.