Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameKalindiLiverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281152
Core clock speed450 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60057.60
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data176.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1*
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2013 7 September 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

HD 8280 Mobile IGP has 400% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP is a notebook graphics card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 174 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP or Playstation 4 Slim GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.