Riva 128 vs Radeon HD 8210
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1309 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.42 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | no data |
| GPU code name | Kalindi | NV3 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 January 2014 (12 years ago) | 1 April 1997 (28 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 4 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 350 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 4 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.400 | 0.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0768 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 1 |
| TMUs | 8 | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | AGP 2x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 100 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x DB13W3 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 January 2014 | 1 April 1997 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 350 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 4 Watt |
HD 8210 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.
Riva 128, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
