ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo vs HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1311not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.43no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameKalindiM10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 January 2014 (12 years ago)13 February 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed300 MHz337 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million76 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.4001.348
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared243 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.776 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2014 13 February 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

HD 8210 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.