CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.43no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameKalindiGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2014 (11 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284480
Core clock speed300 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400394.8
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.49 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2014 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 250 Watt

HD 8210 has 3025% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 127 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 108 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.