ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.42no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameKalindiR350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 January 2014 (12 years ago)16 June 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed300 MHz378 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.4003.024
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared338 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data21.63 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2014 16 June 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8210 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.