ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP vs Radeon HD 8180

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1369not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 2 (1997)
GPU code nameKalindiRage IIC
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateNovember 2013 (12 years ago)1 April 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed225 MHz60 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million5 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.8000.06
Floating-point processing power0.0576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared83 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data664.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)5.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm

HD 8180 has a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8180 and 3D Rage IIC AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8180 is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage IIC AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180
ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP
3D Rage IIC AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate 3D Rage IIC AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8180 or 3D Rage IIC AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.