Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs HD 7970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7970M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.26
+105%

HD 7970M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475660
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Power efficiency6.3520.61
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameWimbledonVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0057.60
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M 9.26
+105%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970M 3568
+105%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1737

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7970M 5645
+58.7%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970M 21938
+113%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7970M 4694
+97.1%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2381

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7970M 31869
+102%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 15770

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

HD 7970M 58
+111%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 27

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+110%
40−45
−110%
Full HD60
+233%
18
−233%
4K16−18
+100%
8
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+46.7%
15
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+55.6%
18
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+90%
10
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+5.2%
58
−5.2%
Hitman 3 16−18
+88.9%
9
−88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+27.3%
22
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−8.3%
65
+8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−36.4%
30
+36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+90%
10
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+110%
10
−110%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+100%
13
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+17.3%
52
−17.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+64.7%
17
−64.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+87.5%
16
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−24%
31
+24%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55
−9.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+175%
8
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+171%
7
−171%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5
−180%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+165%
23
−165%
Hitman 3 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+240%
15
−240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+114%
14
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+213%
8
−213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+22.2%
9
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

This is how HD 7970M and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

  • HD 7970M is 110% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970M is 233% faster in 1080p
  • HD 7970M is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7970M is 1200% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7970M is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.26 4.51
Recency 24 April 2012 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

HD 7970M has a 105.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1454 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.