Radeon Pro W5500X vs HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.03
Power efficiencyno data10.83
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2012 (14 years ago)11 December 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed800 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1757 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40168.7
Floating-point processing power1.229 TFLOPS5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4896
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2012 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 125 Watt

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 has 47% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and Radeon Pro W5500X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W5500X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 or Radeon Pro W5500X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.