Radeon Pro V520 vs HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.03
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2012 (14 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40230.4
Floating-point processing power1.229 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48144
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2012 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 225 Watt

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 has 165% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.