ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX vs HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameTahitiR350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed800 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt94 Watt
Texture fill rate38.403.040
Floating-point processing power1.229 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs488
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz680 MBps
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 94 Watt

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 435.7% more advanced lithography process, and 10.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 or Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.