Radeon RX Vega 9 vs HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.86
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2012 (13 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536576
Core clock speed925 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate88.80no data
Floating-point processing power2.842 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2012 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.