Radeon Pro Vega II vs HD 7950 Boost
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 140 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.04 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.04 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $2,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1574 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 475 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 103.6 | 440.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.315 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Apple MPX |
| Length | 274 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | Quad-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 806 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt |
| HDMI | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 June 2012 | 3 June 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 475 Watt |
HD 7950 Boost has 137.5% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Boost and Radeon Pro Vega II. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Boost is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
