GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs Radeon HD 7870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.55no data
Power efficiency4.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePitcairnGB203
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 March 2012 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128010752
Core clock speed1000 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt415 Watt
Texture fill rate80.00879.3
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPS56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs80336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length241 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s1.02 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 415 Watt

HD 7870 has 137.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7870 and GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 672 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7870 or GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.