ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs HD 7770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameChelseaRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed675 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601.000
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7770M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 LE, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7770M and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M
ATI Radeon 9000 LE
Radeon 9000 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7770M or Radeon 9000 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.