Intel Iris Graphics 5100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

HD 7750M
3.07
+69.6%

Radeon HD 7750M outperforms Iris Graphics 5100 by 70% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking720876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.360.05
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameLombok XLHaswell GT3
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (11 years old)5 June 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$338 $696
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7750M has 620% better value for money than Iris Graphics 5100.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51240
Core clock speed575 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4048.00
Floating-point performance588.8 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7750M and Iris Graphics 5100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7750M 3.07
+69.6%
Iris Graphics 5100 1.81

Radeon HD 7750M outperforms Iris Graphics 5100 by 70% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7750M 1191
+60.5%
Iris Graphics 5100 742

Radeon HD 7750M outperforms Iris Graphics 5100 by 61% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7750M 2085
+81.1%
Iris Graphics 5100 1151

Radeon HD 7750M outperforms Iris Graphics 5100 by 81% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
4K10−12
+42.9%
7
−42.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how HD 7750M and Iris Graphics 5100 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD 7750M is 61.5% faster than Iris Graphics 5100

4K resolution:

  • HD 7750M is 42.9% faster than Iris Graphics 5100

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7750M is 400% faster than the Iris Graphics 5100.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7750M is ahead in 39 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (9%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.07 1.81
Recency 24 April 2012 5 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

The Radeon HD 7750M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 5100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Graphics 5100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 99 votes

Rate Intel Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.