ATI Graphics Ultra vs Radeon HD 7750M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameChelseaMach8
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)1992 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed575 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16ISA 16 Bit
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s40 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

HD 7750M has a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7750M and Graphics Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7750M is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M
ATI Graphics Ultra
Graphics Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.