GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs Radeon HD 7690M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking878not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameThamesTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2013 (12 years ago)25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480896
Core clock speed725 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors716 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate17.4088.20
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS2.822 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache48 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2013 25 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 31 Watt

HD 7690M XT has 24% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7690M XT and GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
Radeon HD 7690M XT
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7690M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 38 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7690M XT or GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.