Quadro Plex 2100 S4 vs Radeon HD 7660G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1105not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.52no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDevastatorG80
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128 ×4
Core clock speed686 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate16.4638.40 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs824 ×4
TMUs2432 ×4
L2 Cacheno data96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 640 Watt

HD 7660G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1728.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660G and Quadro Plex 2100 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro Plex 2100 S4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Quadro Plex 2100 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 150 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660G or Quadro Plex 2100 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.