Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Radeon HD 7660G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10541535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameDevastatorNV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed686 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate16.461.000
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7660G 473
+23550%
NVS 280 SD 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p11no data
Full HD15no data
1200p9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 5 no data
Far Cry 5 9 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
World of Tanks 39 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 15 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
World of Tanks 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 31 May 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

HD 7660G has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660G and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G is a notebook card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 135 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.