Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon HD 7660G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.50no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameDevastatorRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed686 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.4658.00
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660G and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 148 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 255 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660G or Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.