Riva 128 vs Radeon HD 7660D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)no data
GPU code nameDevastatorNV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 1997 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed800 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate19.200.1
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 2x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 32 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 4 Watt

HD 7660D has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 994% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660D and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 149 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 63 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660D or Riva 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.