Radeon Instinct MI308X vs HD 7660D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameDevastatorAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)6 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38419456
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate19.202,554
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs241216
Tensor Coresno data1216
L1 Cacheno data4.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared192 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.3 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 750 Watt

HD 7660D has 650% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI308X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660D and Radeon Instinct MI308X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660D is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI308X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 149 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Instinct MI308X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660D or Radeon Instinct MI308X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.