GeForce MX150 GP107 vs Radeon HD 7660D
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1075 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.09 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.93 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Devastator | GP107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 1532 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 19.20 | 36.77 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 1.177 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 23 February 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
MX150 GP107 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660D and GeForce MX150 GP107. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7660D is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX150 GP107 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
