GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7660D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1083not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)3 April 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed800 MHz1006 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt195 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20135.4
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS3.25 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 3 April 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 195 Watt

HD 7660D has 95% lower power consumption.

GTX 680 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660D and GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Radeon HD 7660D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 144 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660D or GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.