Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1119not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.93no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameThamesGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480192
Core clock speed450 MHz602 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8038.53
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 150 Watt

HD 7650M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

FX 4800 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650M and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7650M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650M or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.