GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs Radeon HD 7650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1141not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameThamesno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48024
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7650M 4563
+3550%
9400M GeForceBoost 125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

HD 7650M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650M and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7650M
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650M or GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.