ATI All-In-Wonder X800 vs Radeon HD 7650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameThamesR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.808.000
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs2416
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

HD 7650M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650M and All-In-Wonder X800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650M is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7650M
ATI All-In-Wonder X800
All-In-Wonder X800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650M or All-In-Wonder X800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.