Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.87
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameWhistlerTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 March 2012 (13 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed485 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors716 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate11.64no data
Floating-point processing power0.4656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 March 2012 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7650M Rebrand has 150% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand and Quadro T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 538 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.