HD Graphics 405 vs Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameWhistlerBraswell
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48016
Core clock speed485 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors716 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate11.6411.20
Floating-point processing power0.4656 gflops0.1792 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 March 2012 1 April 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand and HD Graphics 405. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand is a desktop card while HD Graphics 405 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 197 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.