HD 7650A vs HD 8750A

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.23
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMarsOnega
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 February 2013 (11 years old)5 January 2012 (12 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262
Current priceno data$46 (0.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors950 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4014.40
Floating-point performance460.8 gflops576.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
WidthMXM ModuleMXM Module

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 2 February 2013 5 January 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 33 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750A and Radeon HD 7650A. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A
AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Radeon HD 7650A

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.