GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon HD 7650A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency3.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameOnegaGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4805888
Core clock speed600 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors716 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40190.4
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS12.19 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache48 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 80 Watt

HD 7650A has 142.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650A and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Radeon HD 7650A
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650A or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.