ATI FireGL 8800 vs Radeon HD 7650A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency3.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameOnegaR200
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2012 (13 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors716 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.402.400
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz290 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s9.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 7650A has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7650A and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650A is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 8800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Radeon HD 7650A
ATI FireGL 8800
FireGL 8800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650A or FireGL 8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.