ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs Radeon HD 7620G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1119not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.62no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameDevastatorRV380
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed360 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed497 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate11.932.000
Floating-point processing power0.3817 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VHDCI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 20 Watt

HD 7620G has a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7620G and FireMV 2400 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7620G is a notebook card while FireMV 2400 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7620G
Radeon HD 7620G
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
FireMV 2400 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.