ATI Radeon X300 SE vs HD 7610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1016not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.80no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameWhistlerRV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (14 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed450 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors716 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0001.300
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 30 Watt

HD 7610M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7610M and Radeon X300 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7610M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon HD 7610M
ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7610M or Radeon X300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.