Radeon E9175 PCIe vs HD 7600G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.23no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameDevastatorLexa
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2012 (13 years ago)3 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed320 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.1839.01
Floating-point processing power0.3256 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs5x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 3 October 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7600G has 163.2% lower power consumption.

E9175 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7600G and Radeon E9175 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7600G
Radeon HD 7600G
AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe
Radeon E9175 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 108 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon E9175 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7600G or Radeon E9175 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.