ATI Graphics Xpression ISA vs Radeon HD 7600G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1182not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.17no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameDevastatorMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed320 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.18no data
Floating-point processing power0.3256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared40 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 600 nm

HD 7600G has a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7600G and Graphics Xpression ISA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7600G is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Xpression ISA is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7600G
Radeon HD 7600G
ATI Graphics Xpression ISA
Graphics Xpression ISA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 100 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Graphics Xpression ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7600G or Graphics Xpression ISA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.