Radeon RX 6700 vs HD 7560G IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated90
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.65
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)9 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562304
Core clock speed496 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed760 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate12.16352.8
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 9 June 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 175 Watt

HD 7560G IGP has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 6700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560G IGP and Radeon RX 6700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1510 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560G IGP or Radeon RX 6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.