Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs HD 7560D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.28no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed760 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1668 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate12.16427.0
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS13.66 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 7 August 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 345 Watt

HD 7560D has 431% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560D and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 161 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 31 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.