Iris Plus Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 7560D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1130not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.28no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteIce Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)4 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed760 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1633.60
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS1.075 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 4 May 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560D and Iris Plus Graphics G7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560D is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 158 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or Iris Plus Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.